wine blog

Rotie Cellars 2010 “Little G” and “Dre”

Little G and Dre. At first mention, these names sound a bit like a young and an old school rap artist. This being a wine blog and all, I’m referring to the recent 100% Grenache (Little G) and 100% Mourvedre (Dre) releases from Rotie Cellars. For those not familiar with Rotie Cellars, they are located within the city limits of Walla Walla, Washington and specialize in Rhone blends. As I recently discovered, they’re also making some excellent varietal wines as well.

My first experience with Rotie Cellars occurred on a trip to Walla Walla in late May. I had read some good things about Rotie online, so I booked an appointment and visited the winery, where I tasted their Northern Blend, Southern Blend, and Southern White (reviews can be found here). What really struck me was the buzz about Rotie Cellars and winemaker/owner Sean Boyd around the Walla Walla wine community. Of the 20 or so wineries that I visited, I’m not exaggerating when I say that Rotie Cellars was mentioned as a must-stop by greater than 50% of the winemakers/staff that we came across.

Several factors lead me to believe that Rotie’s wines are going to be practically unobtainable within a few years. There’s a growing buzz about the winery, the wine is excellent and well-priced (they’re most expensive bottle at this time is $45.00), and the production is very low–currently at 2000 cases per year. I can’t help but think that this scenario is one high Wine Advocate score away from playing out (and Parker and co. like their Rhone blends and varietals). One way to stake a claim to Rotie’s future releases is to join their wine club and enlist with the ranks of the Rotiesians. The Little G and Dre are noted as “Club Only Releases” on Rotie’s website.

 

Rotie Cellars Little G 2010

Price: Suggested retail is $45.00

Date Tasted: 6/23/2012

From The Winery: 100% Grenache, 14.1% alcohol, 100 cases produced

Impressions/Notes: Dark ruby in color. Presented with red berries and an alluring garrigue aroma. As it opened up a bit, menthol and watermelon joined the party. After my first taste, I made the comment that it was “very Pinot Noir-like” (I subsequently read the tasting notes on Rotie’s website which also made that same comparison). Medium-bodied, with flavors of cherry and light cedar, along with the previously mentioned watermelon and menthol. Refreshing, with generous acidity. An outstanding effort that really showcases what Grenache can do in Washington. Gin and Juice? Not for me–I’ll take the Little G.

Rating: Highly Recommended/Stellar (92-96), 4/5 Value 

 

Rotie Cellars Dre 2010

Price: Suggested retail is $45.00

Date Tasted: 7/3/2012

From The Winery: 100% Mourvedre, 15% alcohol, 100 cases produced, sourced from Block #34 of Alder Ridge Vineyard in the Horse Heaven Hills AVA

Impressions/Notes: Garnet in color, with subtle aromas of cherry, rhubarb, and smoke on the nose. Light-medium in body, with generous acidity appearing after the mouth-watering cherry flavor sits in. Ended with a super-clean finish.

Rating: Recommended/Highly Recommended (88-92), 2.5/5 Value 

***Disclaimer- These wines were received as samples from the winery.

Posted on by Nick in $20 Above, Grenache, Mourvedre, Washington, Wine Column Leave a comment

5 Recommended Wine Blogs

Since the start of WineSpeak USA this past January, I’ve become more immersed in wine blogs than ever before. Not just my own, mind you. I’ve really enjoyed the interactions that I’ve had with other bloggers and the valuable information that they have provided on their various blogs. This week, I would like to recognize five other wine blogs that I frequently haunt. I highly recommend these blogs to any wine lover. In no particular order, they are as follows:

New Hampshire Wine-man

Dennis Tsiorbas posts thorough reviews for a wide variety of wines each week. I’ve purchased a handful of the wines that he has favorably reviewed and have yet to be disappointed.  One of his recommendations, the J Vineyards Pinot Gris 2010, has been among my favorite white wines of this young summer.

The Thirsty Kitten

Kip and Lucy post once a week, focusing on their latest wine adventures. Whether it be a night out with friends or a dinner party at home, their accounts never fail to entertain.

Bach to Bacchus

TJ Jones, a retired Napa resident, writes detailed accounts of the various wineries (mostly in the Napa Valley) that he and his wife have visited. Napa sure looks like a great place to be a retiree!

Washington Wine Report

Sean Sullivan has been writing about all things Washington wine in his Washington Wine Report since 2005. With my love for Washington wines cemented following my recent trip to Walla Walla, Washington, I visit this blog a lot.

Vinography

Alder Yarrow’s Vinography, started in 2004, continues to be one of the top (if not the top) wine blogs out there. It’s chock-full of great information. Reading Yarrow’s accounts of the various tasting events that he has attended leaves me both well-informed and a bit jealous!

Posted on by Nick in Wine Column 6 Comments

Rating Scale Changes

Up until recently, I have been using a bifurcated rating scale for wines reviewed on this blog. Wines that retailed for $20.00 and below were rated on a 0-20 scale, while wines that retailed for over $20.00 were rated as either Stellar, Highly Recommended, Recommended, Not Too Shabby, and Pass.

Pretty maids all in a row at Rasa Vineyards–it's not very relevant to this post but it is a beautiful sight.

I’ve decided that it’s time for a change, especially while the blog is still young (less than 6 months old). The bifurcated system may have been a little bit confusing to some–hell, it was getting confusing for me and I came up with it. My rationale when I adopted the system was that most of the wines that I reviewed would retail for under $20.00 and I wanted to review these wines with a bit more specificity than the wines retailing for over $20.00. As it turns out, I’ve probably ended up reviewing more wines that retail for over $20.00 than under.

I really struggled with selecting the revised scale to be used going forward. My original thought was to switch to the controversial 100 point scale and I have to admit that I was very close to doing it. My big hang-up was the rigidity of the scale. I could surely come up with a firm score for a wine on a given day, but feel that certain variables (i.e. place at which tasted, temperature at which tasted, age at which tasted) might move the score up or down a few points if tasted on a different day.

Let me make it clear that I have no problem with the 100 point scale itself. I do have a problem when people misuse it and take a score with subjective components and treat is as fact. At the end of the day, it’s an opinion. It may have come from a very experienced professional, but it’s still an opinion. Treat it as a resource and work on developing your own palate.

I apologize for the slight digression. Anyway, I wanted the revised scale to offer more flexibility than the classic 100 point system, so there will be accompanying point ranges associated with each rating.

I also want to place more of an emphasis on the value of a given wine. To that end, I have added a second rating scale which measures my opinion of the quality of the wine.

Effective as of today, I will be utilizing the following scales of quality and value when rating all wines:

 

Quality Rating Scale

Stellar (95-100) A rare and unforgettable wine of astounding quality.

Highly Recommended (90-94) Very high quality. A special, well-made wine.

Recommended (86-89) Good to very good quality. Perfect for everyday drinking.

Not Too Shabby (80-85) If you see this wine on sale, it’s worth a try.

Pass (0-79) There are too many other fish in the sea, or rather too many other wines on the shelves.

 

Value Rating Scale

5/5   Exceptional Value

4/5   Very Well-Priced

3/5   Well-Priced

2/5   Slightly Overpriced

1/5    Overpriced

The range of scores noted on the quality scale will be included as part of the rating. For example, Wine X has a quality rating of Highly Recommended (90-94) and has a value rating of 4/5.

The new rating system is not perfect (is there a such thing as a perfect rating system when it comes to wines?) but it fits with the information that I want to convey to readers when reviewing a wine. And hey, it’s a lot simpler than reviewing wines on two totally different quality scales.

 

Posted on by Nick in Wine Column 2 Comments

Trust Thy Palate

The most liberating moment that I’ve experienced as a wine drinker was the realization that I had grown to trust my palate. I was recently reminded of this experience while commenting on a fellow blogger’s wine review. He made the disclaimer that one of the larger publications had not given the wine in question a favorable rating, but that he trusted his own palate and had thoroughly enjoyed the wine. His comment really hit home with me.

I didn’t always trust my palate. During my early wine drinking days, I relied heavily on the scores/ratings that a wine had received from larger publications when selecting a wine. As discussed in a previous post, my opinion is that these scores can be helpful when used the right way but should not be viewed as dogma.

So what changed? There are two aha moments that I can point to. The first moment occurred a couple of years ago and involved a pinot noir, namely the 2007 Saintsbury Garnet from the Carneros region. I purchased the Saintsbury because it came from the notable Napa appellation of Carneros, well-known for its pinot noir, and it was on sale for $13.00 or so. I had no knowledge of any scores it had received from any publications, no real knowledge of the producer–basically, I knew that it was from Carneros and that was it.

It was great and probably one of the better wines that I’ve had for under $20.00. That’s saying a lot for a pinot noir, as there aren’t a gaggle of good pinots available in this price range. I raved about it the whole night and the wine stuck in my head.

A few months later I was reading Matt Kramer on Wine: A Matchless Collection of Columns, Essays, and Observations by America’s Most Original and Lucid Wine Writer. Kramer writes for Wine Spectator and is one of my favorite wine writers. To my surprise, he had written an article in which he detailed the tasting of this wine (although a different vintage) with a skeptical Burgundy shipper and how they were both amazed with the quality and value of the wine. I was ecstatic that a writer of this stature was also impressed with the wine and for the first time, I felt that maybe I was starting to get it.

Heaven on Earth: Sipping some pinot noir with my wife while looking out over the Russian River and the vineyards that surround it.

My second aha moment was a completely different circumstance. By this time I trusted my palate, but it’s always nice to have a reaffirmation of your trust. The wine in question was, ironically, another pinot noir. I thought this particular pinot was pretty good, robust for a pinot, but pretty good. You can imagine my surprise when The Wine Advocate described this wine as “pretty”. When I think of pretty, I’m thinking along the lines of Natalie Portman. This particular pinot reminded me more of Chyna, the female wrestler (although I guess that some thought her pretty, as she did pose for a particular magazine of questionable repute). This moment really stuck with me. Rather than relent that I had whiffed on describing this wine, which I would have done a few years ago, I still stick to my guns that I was accurate on my assessment.

I’m certainly not saying that I’m anywhere near the level of Matt Kramer or the tasters for The Wine Advocate. I do feel that I’m at the point where I can confidently assess a wine.

If you are at the point where you trust your palate, great! For those who are still trying to get there, I have two very basic pieces of advice: taste a lot of different wines and write a tasting note for each one of them. It took a lot of practice and repetition for me to get comfortable with my tasting ability and to get to the point where I could publish my thoughts for the world to see. And it sure was fun (and still is) drinking all of that wine!

 

Posted on by Nick in Wine Column 2 Comments

Highly Recommended Wine Books

The most important and the most enjoyable component of building a wine education is tasting a large variety of wines and developing your palate. If you want to truly broaden your wine knowledge, however, you can’t just stop there. The books listed below have had a profound impact on my understanding and appreciation of wine and I highly recommend them to anyone that wants to further their wine education.

 

The Wine Bible, written by Karen MacNeil

The Wine Bible is a terrific guide for beginners but thorough enough to be a helpful resource for the more experienced. The book begins with a basic introduction to tasting and evaluating wine. Other notable topics includes a comprehensive list of the grapes used to make wine and tips on buying, storing, aerating, and decanting wine.

The most valuable resource inside is the in depth look at the major wine growing regions of the world, complete with maps, local winemaking laws, and information regarding notable producers in the respective regions. MacNeil does a great job of personalizing the book with fun, interesting anecdotes and providing readers with an easily approachable and unpretentious guide to the world of wine.

 

Judgment of Paris, written by George M. Taber

If you’re interested in the history of California wine and the tasting event that put the US on the world’s wine map, this book is a must read. Written by George M. Taber, the Time magazine reporter that covered the famous 1976 wine tasting event that pitted California wines against France’s best, the book gives the reader a sense of the Napa Valley before it was a big time wine region.

Judgment of Paris provides an account of the rise of Napa institutions such as Chateau Montelena and Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars. What I found most interesting were the stories of the people that have had such an influence in the California and consequently the American wine industry. Pioneers such as Andre Tchelistcheff, Mike Grgich, Lee Stewart, and Warren Winiarski are truly inspiring figures for any wannabe winemaker.

Without a doubt, this book is one of my all time favorites. Taber’s simply a great storyteller and the rise of the Napa Valley is a great story. The American wine industry is forever indebted to him, as his Time article played a huge part in the industry’s rise and success. I was very excited to find Taber on Twitter- you can follow him at @GeorgeMTaber.

 

The University Wine Course, written by Marian W. Baldy

As the title might indicate, this book is actually a college textbook on wine appreciation. I know that I said college textbook, but hold on, stay with me! Baldy provides an in depth view of the sensory evaluation of wine, a/k/a “is this wine good.” Also included are chapters on the production of red wine, white wine, and fortified wine. Baldy also touches on the subject of grape growing and vineyard management.

Other cool features of the University Wine Course include quizzes to test your wine knowledge, tasting diagrams, and various tips and tools to set up home tastings. This is not the ideal book for beginners, but when you’re ready to tackle some of the more technical aspects of wine, buy this book. If I would have had college courses like this, I definitely would have gone to class much more often.

 

Note: As I was flipping through these books today, I couldn’t help but notice that Robert Mondavi’s approval was stamped on each one: on the front cover of the Wine Bible, on the back cover of the University Wine Course, and in the foreword of Judgment of Paris. I wanted to write about Mr. Mondavi and I took this as a sign that maybe next week is the time to do it. Stay tuned!

Posted on by Nick in California, Wine Books, Wine Column Leave a comment